"If we can’t write diversity into sci-fi, then what’s the point? You don’t create new worlds to give them all the same limits of the old ones."

Jane Espenson (from interview with Advocate.com)\

I dunno how many which ways this needs to be said

(via aragingquiet)

funny how she’s now showrunner of Once Upon a Time which is shitty at representation

1 hour ago with 77,492 notes — via gingerblivet, © fluffymoalabear
#science fiction #diversity #representation #jane espenson



alliartist:

rifa:

prokopetz:

nebcondist1:

prokopetz:

I’ve seen this image going around, and I feel compelled to point out that it’s only half-right. It’s true that high heels were originally a masculine fashion, but they weren’t originally worn by butchers - nor for any other utilitarian purpose, for that matter.
High heels were worn by men for exactly the same reason they’re worn by women today: to display one’s legs to best effect. Until quite recently, shapely, well-toned calves and thighs were regarded as an absolute prerequisite for male attractiveness. That’s why you see so many paintings of famous men framed to show off their legs - like this one of George Washington displaying his fantastic calves:

… or this one of Louis XIV of France rocking a fabulous pair of red platform heels (check out those thighs!):

… or even this one of Charles I of England showing off his high-heeled riding boots - note, again, the visual emphasis on his well-formed calves:

In summary: were high heels originally worn by men? Yes. Were they worn to keep blood off their feet? No at all - they were worn for the same reason they’re worn today: to look fabulous.

so then how did they become a solo feminine item of attire?

A variety of reasons. In France, for example, high heels fell out out of favour in the court of Napoleon due to their association with aristocratic decadence, while in England, the more conservative fashions of the Victorian era regarded it as indecent for a man to openly display his calves.
But then, fashions come and go. The real question is why heels never came back into fashion for men - and that can be laid squarely at the feet of institutionalised homophobia. Essentially, heels for men were never revived because, by the early 20th Century, sexually provocative attire for men had come to be associated with homosexuality; the resulting moral panic ushered in an era of drab, blocky, fully concealing menswear in which a well-turned calf simply had no place - a setback from which men’s fashion has yet to fully recover.

FASHION HISTORY IS HUMAN HISTORY OK

Thank you, history side of tumblr. That “stay out of blood” thing has been driving me mad.

so once again homophobia strikes. how unsurprising.

alliartist:

rifa:

prokopetz:

nebcondist1:

prokopetz:

I’ve seen this image going around, and I feel compelled to point out that it’s only half-right. It’s true that high heels were originally a masculine fashion, but they weren’t originally worn by butchers - nor for any other utilitarian purpose, for that matter.

High heels were worn by men for exactly the same reason they’re worn by women today: to display one’s legs to best effect. Until quite recently, shapely, well-toned calves and thighs were regarded as an absolute prerequisite for male attractiveness. That’s why you see so many paintings of famous men framed to show off their legs - like this one of George Washington displaying his fantastic calves:

… or this one of Louis XIV of France rocking a fabulous pair of red platform heels (check out those thighs!):

… or even this one of Charles I of England showing off his high-heeled riding boots - note, again, the visual emphasis on his well-formed calves:

In summary: were high heels originally worn by men? Yes. Were they worn to keep blood off their feet? No at all - they were worn for the same reason they’re worn today: to look fabulous.

so then how did they become a solo feminine item of attire?

A variety of reasons. In France, for example, high heels fell out out of favour in the court of Napoleon due to their association with aristocratic decadence, while in England, the more conservative fashions of the Victorian era regarded it as indecent for a man to openly display his calves.

But then, fashions come and go. The real question is why heels never came back into fashion for men - and that can be laid squarely at the feet of institutionalised homophobia. Essentially, heels for men were never revived because, by the early 20th Century, sexually provocative attire for men had come to be associated with homosexuality; the resulting moral panic ushered in an era of drab, blocky, fully concealing menswear in which a well-turned calf simply had no place - a setback from which men’s fashion has yet to fully recover.

FASHION HISTORY IS HUMAN HISTORY OK

Thank you, history side of tumblr. That “stay out of blood” thing has been driving me mad.

so once again homophobia strikes. how unsurprising.

1 hour ago with 121,936 notes — via jadedbirch, © makemelaughblog



generalbriefing:

thepoliticalfreakshow:

You can no longer wiggle out of a murder charge in California by saying you were frightened by a scary lesbian. 

Current California law allows a murder charge to be reduced to manslaughter if the killing happened in the heat of passion - the so-called “panic defense”. Defendants charged with murdering members of the LGBT community have been able to claim they acted in a “moment of passion” upon discovering the victim was LGBT, and therefor their crime met the requirements for a reduced charge of manslaughter. The bill that passed the Assembly this week will bar defendants from using their victim’s gender or sexual orientation to support a panic defense. An identical bill passed the state senate in May.

susan_bonilla.jpgDemocratic Assemblywoman Susan Bonilla (right) sponsored the bill, which passed on a 50-10 vote. Ms. Bonilla told reporters that such defenses legitimize violence against LGBT people. 

Though The American Bar Association advocates curtailing the use of the “gay panic” defense, California is the first state to ban using the “heat of passion” defense because the victim was LGBT. 

The bill now heads for Governor Jerry Brown’s desk for his signature. 

Susan Bonilla photo via Facebook

Source: Jean Ann Esselink for The New Civil Rights Movement

Now, if we could only eliminate this defense when arguing “scary Black person”….

One step at a time.

1 hour ago with 679 notes — via gingerblivet, © thepoliticalfreakshow



1 hour ago with 11,693 notes — via gingerblivet, © jamietheignorantamerican



adriansspirit:

Do you ever just sit and stare at your bookshelf and take out your favorite books and feel the covers and slide them back on the shelf or is that just me

1 hour ago with 11,552 notes — via gingerblivet, © emmacrrstairs



tsuki-nekota:

Sammy’s life is hard

1 hour ago with 21,604 notes — via blushingmisha, © tsuki-nekota



glorious costumes from the upcoming The Empress of China
1 hour ago with 58,698 notes — via badwolfwillrise, © crushalltheraspberries



"Privilege is a right or immunity granted as a peculiar benefit, advantage, or favor. There is racial privilege, gender (and identity) privilege, heterosexual privilege, economic privilege, able-bodied privilege, educational privilege, religious privilege, and the list goes on and on. At some point, you have to surrender to the kinds of privilege you hold. Nearly everyone, particularly in the developed world, has something someone else doesn’t, something someone else yearns for."
— Roxane Gay, Bad Feminist (via brutereason)
1 hour ago with 105 notes — via brutereason



ssjdebusk:

thebloggerbloggerfun:

beestiels:

dean winchester is so bisexual that when he broke through the barrier of naomi’s mind control over castiel, naomi’s office flashed with the colors of the bisexual flag

…oh wait

image

but really though.

Remember when they told us to look for symbolism in the walls and then this happened. Yeah I do. 

3 hours ago with 7,757 notes — via destielcult, © beestiels



huffingtonpost:

Schooled  Larry King.

Watch the full interview here.

4 hours ago with 145,615 notes — via markacrossmyheart, © huffingtonpost



micdotcom:

55 Twitter photos from space that will fill you with ethereal wonder

Reid Wiseman is a national treasure.

Follow micdotcom 

4 hours ago with 155,842 notes — via thequixoticbedhead, © micdotcom



aconitum-trek:

I think this kind of sums up the real Kirk.

aconitum-trek:

I think this kind of sums up the real Kirk.

9 hours ago with 298 notes — via evil-wears-a-bow, © lovely-trek



surrealkat:

vodkaand-cigarettes:

"I felt so angry at the UCSB massacre and the sexism we’re blind to everyday so I drew about my opinions on sexism to channel my rage."
Source http://rasenth.tumblr.com/post/86791553337/i-felt-so-angry-at-the-ucsb-massacre-an-article

DAMN RIGHT

11 hours ago with 386,868 notes — via spodiddly, © vodkaand-cigarettes



bakasara:

Deconstructing Masculinity & Manhood with Michael Kimmel @ Dartmouth College

This is seriously so very important. This is fundamental.

11 hours ago with 102,245 notes — via bakasara, © exgynocraticgrrl



yoshio-yoshida:

Oh my god youre straight? I had no idea. You seem normal to me. Did you know that Sara is straight to? You two should totally hook up. I cant believe youre straight. You could be my straight best friend. We could go to football games together. Itll be so much fun. So like how long have you been straight? Youre whole life!? No way.

11 hours ago with 151,268 notes — via prygelknabe, © yoshio-yoshida